Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 740/LB TO 744/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2002. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 740/LB TO 744/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2002.

Sections 52, 86 and 61 of CBR Circular No. 19 1999, dated 149 1999 by a person failing to receive or pay tax on account of payment of tax under section 52 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 The first appellate authority revoked the order, passing a separate order for each year, with an additional tax on the observation of audit authorities in the assessment year from the last five years on the total payment on the relevant supply, Each year, there was no legal direction on such directions in the first appellate authority that concerned current business continuity. Except for this year, the decision was held for only one year, the first appellate authority to conduct a second year investigation, which the appraising officer could not be bound. Follow its Remarks Such remarks were not zoned with powers that had not been authorized to commence proceedings for years before the continuation of proceedings for the closing years under section 52 of the Income Tax Ordinance. Was not exempt from action; proceedings may be initiated at any time during the 1979 financial year if the Assessing Officer fails to acknowledge the default issue of the Assessment Income tax for assessment under section 61 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 After collecting the information obtained from the book sought under section 61 of the Ordinance, 1979, From the CC statement or other such information, during the financial year, the tie can proceed. The books of accounts for one period, which were not more than three years before the income tax proviso from section 61 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, advocates from Mamu kunjan lawyer