THE CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION, LAHORE ZONE, OLD ANARKALI, LAHORE versus SAJJAD HUSSAIN BHATTI
Sections 7 and 8 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) seniority, promotion post of Stoop rights were renamed / renamed to Stenographer's post. Priority appeal was made. Prior to the service tribunal's appeal to the service tribunal and the civil servant employed as a senior for other public servants, other government employees were picked up by notification of the resignation of those positions. He was declared senior, justification could not be promoted. Claimed as a matter of right because the seniority itself could never fulfill the absolute right to be promoted above other considerations, but that did not mean that the facts of the seniority could be ignored without justification. Should. Every civil servant had the right to be considered for development and to refuse and to refuse to promote was an issue that was within the special education domain of the appropriate authority to be used properly. The notification had just changed the name and re-designated the position of statistician, thus there was no significant impact on the question of sanity and the notification could not be given any prejudice. Misinformation and misrepresentation were made by government officials. The enfranchised civil servant was previously appointed as a stenographer and was senior to all stenotypists who were subsequently designated as stenographers and as a result of which the service tribunal derived and was strictly law enforcement. Was in accordance with them
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
