Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMED versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB

The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) was filed before the Promotion List Service Tribunal with a delay of two decades; the official employee's complaint was that he was not included in the BI list without taking the required examination. , From which he became eligible. The ploy offered by a civil servant was that two other civil servants were included in the list without such tests. The justified employee was 54 years of age and he failed to explain why he After crossing the required threshold, it remains silent for about two decades. The 33-year-old was made public before being referred to the service tribunal for the relocation of the required test, and all designated officials and officers were informed that the matter could be brought to all qualified persons without further notice. A test was brought to the list of B1, it was not permissible for any court law to give such a directive in the present case. The Supreme Court refused. Give any relief to the civil servant because the court did not control the circumstances in which both the public servants were brought to the forefront of the list and if the same was hidden in violation of the law then there was no precedent. Could have Court admits Supreme Court refuses to interfere with leave to appeal by service tribunal patent advocate from Kunjah lawyer