Find a Lawyer

MAQSOOD AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 2302 / evidence 34 Definition of evidence was present in the case, in which no injury was attributed to acquittal of any of the accused and it was the accused who prosecuted due to the fatal injury on the main part of the victim. Although the two eyewitnesses presented were close to the complainant, they were natural and independent witnesses. The incident took place in front of the witnesses' house and there was no previous background of the enmity which had preceded the trial. The hearing had already taken a mild approach because of the no-death sentence that the prosecution had failed to prove. The motivational ocular account was fully convinced by medical evidence that the principle of chaff grain investigation was fully applicable to the trial court's right to acquit the co-accused, as the eyes presented by the prosecution. The witnesses were natural and independent prosecutors who proved their case against the accused's appeal. The accused was acquitted of his conviction and conviction for being less merit d immigration advocate from Mehar lawyer