HABIB BANK LIMITED versus RAMZAN BAKHSH TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED
Section 2 (c) Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 126 Guarantee Agreement Guarantee form filed by the plaintiff bank was not a viable and enforceable agreement between the parties and there was no need to suspend the matter against the relevant. Will not serve the purpose. After giving opportunity to the defendants to appear and claim them, in the present case the defendant bank, guarantees, guarantees, compensation under plaintiff's bank, section 2 (c) of the financial affairs. The same cannot be said about cars or plaintiff bank customers. It has been stated that the defendants were only in their capacity as guarantors and not as mortgages. In these cases, the names of the defendants were excluded from the defendants' ranks and they were executed as parties in case the defendant's financing was not guaranteed. The names of the plaintiffs' company were therefore killed on the basis of the provisions of OI, R10, CPC which were ordered under the agreement of the plaintiff in the case of the plaintiff as the respondent in this case. Ali and the plaintiff were against the other defendants in the case. Cannot be partially rejected for defendants who were not bank users
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
