SAMIULLAH KHAN MARWAT versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Rr 3 (a) (b) (c), 4 (1) (b) (iv), 5 & 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Service Accused of serving as Sessions P and DIG of police against dismissed government employees, charges related to controlling subordinates, targeting civilians through illegal arrests, detention and registration of false cases, official tribunals Government employee's appeal was dismissed by. According to the inquiry officer's report and the Prime Minister's Inspection Commission, the inquiry officer found the official employee guilty of such charges after issuing a final showcase notice to the public servant and considering the matter. The service department authorities had also considered the report of the Prime Minister's Inspection Commission, which was neither brought to the record before the inquiry officer nor placed in a civil surgeon. Such a report of the Prime Minister's Inspection Commission against government employment for investigative purposes cannot be construed as material under the Government Investigation Commission (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules, 1973, a report by the Service Tribunal Or the appropriate and legal inquiries of the Inquiry Officer who were not cited were not guilty of misreading or reading the evidence while assuming charge of public servants, section CPP and DIG police, would be considered to be the protector of civil rights and Was under legal obligation, not to allow its subordinates to use it guaranteed under the Constitution Or to the innocent people's rights and freedoms protection law rather than criminal law machinery
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer