M. SALEEM SHEIKH versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN
Section 41A & 41C Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court Requires Permanent Alternative Presence The removal of directors or other executives of a banking company by the State Bank of Pakistan would be equally effective. And although the Administrative Tribunal assumes jurisdiction illegally, whenever the Administrative Tribunal exercises its jurisdiction, such tribunals may not be required to prosecute their complaints, unless the Constitutional Petition is always It would have been entertaining at that time if the constitutional petition was Mast Li lived. , It may be shown that the facts or legal grounds on which the State Bank of Pakistan took jurisdiction did not exist or if such jurisdiction was not taken for the purposes set out in the Ordinance of the Banking Companies, 1962 , But for some other suicide attack, an application under Article 199 of the Constitution would have required the material or prerequisites to be understood, but it was passed on the ground that false discovery of fact and application of law If so, the affected party usually has to take advantage of alternatives related to the law, before approaching It happens High court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Malakand lawyer