Find a Lawyer

MESSRS SHAHMURD SUGAR MILLS LTD. versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Section 16 (v) [as amended by Sugar Factories Control (Sindh Amendment) Ordinance (11 of 1985)] Notification No. 8 (142) SO (Ext) 89 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Response 199, 2A, 3, 4 18, 25, 38 and 227 Constitutional Subsection Section 16 (v), Payment of the Quality Premium of the farmers of Sindh Province under Section 16 (v) of the Sugar Factories Control Act, 1950 [As in Sindh. [Edit] The point of the mill owners was that although under the Sindh (Amendment) Ordinance 1985, the "standard premium payment to the farmers" was made viable, it had expired and due to this There was no legislation after that. The provincial government has been compelling Sindh to collect the standard premium or direct the sugar mills to pay the farmers the same but they are being forced to make the same payment despite legal authority. That in section 16 (v) of the Act, the delegation delegating authority to the provincial government faced excessive delegation and was arbitrary because no directive had been specified. That the provincial government wants to issue new notifications containing instructions for farmers to pay premiums of the same quality. Similar provision was abolished by the High Court in the case of Military Sugar Mills v. Punjab 1996 CLC 592 in Punjab province and no standard premium was imposed in the Punjab province and Sindh province insisted on it. The discrimination of Sindh on the payment of such income by Sugar Mills was un-Islamic and thus a violation of the Constitution of Pakistan's Arts 2A, 3, 4, 18, 25, 38 and 227 for Sugar Mills in Punjab Province. Was in Sindh province against the provincial government famous supreme court advocate from Swat lawyer