Section 17 (3) (4) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 397/412/149 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6, 7, 12 , 19, 23, 25 and 28 A case of appreciation of evidence was filed in the Special Judge's Court established under the Anti-Terrorism Activities Press Act, 1975, but not later when the province When I established the Anti-Terrorism Court, the Anti-Terrorism Court was transferred to the Anti-Terrorism Court, but the Anti-Terrorism Court did not schedule any crime against the accused. The trial court was transferred, although the accused could not be prosecuted, but under the provisions of section 19, the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the Anti-Terrorism Court could directly examine the matter, sending a file once. Later and his opinion was that the crime committed by the accused falls under the purview of Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. When such an opinion is made, it will prove to be a crime under the jurisdiction of the Anti-Terrorism Court, on the issue of obtaining a file from the Special Court established under the Anti-Terrorism Activities Act, 1975. Acknowledged the aforementioned act taken by the Anti-Terrorism Court. Eleven witnesses of the prosecution were examined by a special court of the judge not to be illegal and on the basis of the offenses they were charged, it was a court of competent jurisdiction because the relevant anti-terrorism in the province at the time. No court was established, rightly taken, and so on
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
