Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TAHIR SIDDIQUI versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY

Section 16A (C), 18 (8), 24 (B) and 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 186 referred to the transfer of the case by the Supreme Court Petition for the transfer of the accused applicants. ??? Applicants for the transfer of a court to a ??? court ??? location ??? reference were made available at the earliest available time when the trial was proceeding against them in the initial stage, the prosecution did not bring any concrete material. On the record to show that the applicants tried to tamper with the evidence of the prosecution by threatening the prosecution's witnesses or presenting the need for a reference trial elsewhere. Prima's entire investigation into the case was made in the same context where the reference was sought, transfer, indictment, prosecution and defense witnesses were linked to the \ K place where the alleged crime took place, law enforcement litigation cases. Was required to stand trial. Ed hurriedly, while the present accountability court A function was not working when the authority to move a case from one court to another had to be carefully and cautiously maintained, but if the court proceeded in a proper case Will not hesitate to do so. Demand for the elimination of justice is one of the most common situations related to the transfer of a case from one court to another; it was evidence of special prejudice to any party or witnesses for logistical reasons or such factors. Especially when there is an alternative case, do not seriously handicap the state, but rather the accused in conducting a fair and impartial case in a far more favorable environment. online advocate from Kohistan lawyer