KHIZER HAYAT versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (EDUCATION), SIALKOT
Appointment of the Constitution Section of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 Constitutional Appeal, the cancellation of the applicant was appointed PTC teachers, but their appointment was canceled and the applicant along with 113 other teachers. Did not file an appeal against the cancellation of his appointment while all other persons had earlier filed appeals. The service tribunal, which was accepted and instructed to restore the service post, which did not file an appeal, claimed that it deserved the same treatment given to others and that They also cannot be discriminated against who did not enter any representation. Nor was the appeal filed before the service tribunal; the matter had not been finalized until the date of his appointment. Each case has its own merits and it cannot be said that the applicant's case was the same as that of other government employees who could not be ordered to cancel relief seeking nst appointment from the forum and that the authorities be directed to do so. Reinstate the job because the applicant should have appealed to the service tribunal regarding his terms and conditions of service, but if he did not do so, he would face it too.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
