ZULFIQAR ALIAS ZULA versus THE STATE
Section 302/34 accused of defining testimony was immediately named in the FIR filed, eye witnesses explained their presence sufficiently on the occasion of their presence, my relationship with witnesses to the deceased was their testimony. There is no basis for denial, since neutral people usually did not have any prior evidence of prosecutors coming forward to dismiss the culprits, leaving the real culprits behind a defense lawyer or the accused There was no enmity of alternatives, therefore, it was justified not to challenge the conviction of the accused, Zam was implicated in the FIR was not proven and the police did not report the previous beating case. The complaining party had agreed with the other accused in the case. The accused was found guilty in a private complaint case. Was given and he has been in the death cell since 1995 and the age was expected to be changed to death sentence of the accused was sentenced to life imprisonment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Jehlum lawyer
