Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN RAILWAYS versus AJMAL KHAN

Article 212 (3) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Preparation of Section 4 Leaf Retirement Order, Disappointment of Government Employees Upon completion of 25 years of service, such leave was applied for such leave. Was granted but the authorities withdrew the ground order that he was wrongly approved and transferred to a civil servant The Service Tribunal set aside the order of withdrawal and the leave order presented by the authorities That any appeal or plea of a public servant could not be considered. They had complied with the transfer allowance. The civil servant could not be compelled to continue his work against his will upon completion of his 25 years of employment. Authorities did not act in a reasonable and reasonable manner in pursuing their police decision as a transfer order could have been. Instead of insisting on compliance with the wages and disadvantages of a low-wage employee, the authorities were able to deal with employees instead of causing them to suffer and suffer for an employee who had been in the field for more than 25 years. We should adopt a fair, fair and reasonable attitude, rather than a stern attitude to a stern officer. Appeal denied to interfere with decision passed by the service tribunal famous high court advocate from Khurian wala lawyer