ICI POLYESTER EMPLOYEES UNION (CBA) REGISTERED versus TRUSTEES UNION
Sections 7, 227, 229, and 476 of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act (XLII of 1997), Section 20 Employees Provident Fund and Securities Petitioners (Employees' Union) sought direction under section 227 of the Companies Ordinance 1984. The applicant's position was to present receipts of all the money deposited in the Provident Fund by the harmful and plaintiff company under section 7 of the Companies Ordinance, section 7 of the 1984 High Court Company Ordinance, 1984 Accuracy May exercise jurisdiction in all civil matters. Undoubtedly, the Companies Ordinance owns the original civil jurisdiction, however, the context or meaning of the original civil jurisdiction meant that the jurisdiction was granted by law, and the criminal jurisdiction of the Companies Ordinance Was against 1984, it was specifically mentioned. This Court, where it gave the \ Court \ (High Court) jurisdiction to exercise jurisdiction over the exercise of jurisdiction, meant that the Companies heard the case and, under the Ordinance, 1984 The High Court had the legal authority to determine, but the Companies Ordinance, Section 7 of 1984 did not require the High Court to decide on all matters arising under the Companies Ordinance, 1984. It was required under the Companies Ordinance, 1984, that certain sections provided that the High Court would decide on the issue that the High Court decided on the present matter using jurisdiction under section 7 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984. Because it went against this interpretation. Under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 and the ordinance of companies
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
