Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus AHSAN MOHY-UD-DIN

Sections 2 (6) and 10 of the Settlement Scheme VLI violate the Property and Homelessness Act (XIV of 1975), Sections 2 and 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for legitimate applicants to be disputed After the partition, the residential site applied for its relocation under Schedule VII, after lengthy litigation, the High Court directed that the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 and the Displaced Persons (Land) Settlement) Under the Act, 1958, the authorities will decide the matter. After hearing the matter, the notification officer transferred the property to the dispatcher in the dispute under Settlement Scheme VII after hearing, the records appearing in the Revenue Record had proved that the property in the dispute was for applicants for residential purposes. Was used and seized by the source. Except as stated in the Revenue Record and its status and cannot be subjected to agriculture as cultural purposes, the respondents claimed that the settlement fell well within the scope of Scheme VI and it was entitled to the same by the respondents. Was entitled that the applicant's possession of the property was valid in the dispute, he could not find record support and could not. Give more weight property advocates from Village Sunder lawyer