Find a Lawyer

GHULAM DIN versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR EXERCISING POWERS OF ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

Article 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional plea alleges of fraud and fraud in intelligence applications In two cases of the same case, two intelligence applications for the same house were dismissed and the third application was declared invalid in 1983. I was filed. The Additional Settlement Commissioner (Land) of the Evacue Laws upheld the third informant's request that it disagreed with the settlement commissioner's decision on the previous application in 1977 because the same case was previously declared valid. The matter was completely unnecessary and contrary to the law-abiding legal scheme, as an officer in the lower grades could not withstand the order of the Settlement Commissioner's finality and could not be connected to a court order. The allegation of fraud and fraud (by summary application), especially when the two rounds of litigation have ended in favor of the applicants, is the third round of proposals to dismiss the withdrawal rules in 1983. The latter had begun, and if such repeated challenges had not been considered by law, it would have resulted. In a non-exhaustive litigation, the Additional Settlement Commissioner, while trying to correct the revenue record, fully worked to revoke the Settlement Commissioner's order with which he disagreed that the Additional Settlement Commissioner's Such an act was not sustainable in law and was declared as such. us immigration advocates from Haroonabad lawyer