Find a Lawyer

KHALID HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD SABIR JAVED

During the dismissal of the suit for section 14, 30 and 33 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the Declaration of Arbitration Section 42, the parties agreed to appoint three award-winning arbitrators at the trial of the court. Defendants were retained by the appellate court against the award and order of the trial court. The parties reconciled with the arbitrators to resolve the dispute. On which the objections were dismissed and the award made to the court. The appellate court, on appeal from the defendant against the trial decision, dismissed the case with costs and directed the concerned police to file a criminal case against the plaintiff under section 420/406/468/471. , The decisions of the PPC Trial Court and the Appellate Court were correct, if the award had been briefly summarized by the trial court without the objection of the objections filed by the defendant or judicially. The only open court case of appeal was to be remanded to the trial court without a decision on whether to hear the parties properly. After that, according to the law, the objections filed by the defendants can be decided. The appellate court, according to the circumstances, did not conform to the law that the appellate court had committed the unlawful offense, the High Court set aside the decision of the two courts and after the judgment of the objection to the award filed by the defendant in accordance with the law. The case has been remanded for re-decision. how to become a advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer