GHULAM HAIDER versus ZAFAR ULLAH KHAN
A. XXXVII, Rr 2 and 3 The suit for recovery of money on a recovery note claimed that the defendant had obtained the suit on the basis of a promissory note and the defendant had entered into the contract. What did After receiving leave to defend the written case in which he denied the claim of the plaintiff's trial court that after considering the evidence on record, it came to the conclusion that the plaintiff was able to prove it. I was unsuccessful that the promotional note was under consideration and the evidence of this case was dismissed by the trial court rightly because the plaintiff, the promissory note, was clearly inconsistent with regard to the payment and execution of the trial. Was denied and the order to dismiss this case cannot be interfered with.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Goular Khel lawyer
