Find a Lawyer

AASIM SAJJAD SIDDIQUI versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.

The suit for a Section 19 restitution was decided, the appellate court's objection to the sale of the mortgaged property was dismissed, and the appellant's / appellant's argument that the sale was affirmed was that no auction was made on the spot. The question was whether the auction was not made at all. The issue can be resolved on the spot only after the banking court is able to formulate the case and present evidence to the parties. And if no auction had been made, no valid sale could be confirmed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• Mst. NASREEN FATIMA v. The BANK OF PUNJAB through Manager 2013 CLD 218
• WAPDA through Authorised Attorney v. CRESCENT GROUP OF SERVICES through Authorised Person 2013 PLD 221
• AKBAR ALI v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER 2013 YLR 222
• FAISAL ILYAS v. Rana ASIF MEHMOOD 2013 PLD 224
• ALI AHMAD v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SIALKOT 2013 YLR 226
• RIZWAN ZAFAR v. State 2013 PCrLJ 226
• NASIR AHMAD v. Dr. FAIZA BASHIR 2013 PLD 228
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLD 228

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

online advocate from Amangarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes