MST. GHULAM JANNAT versus ALLAH DITTA
Section 12 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 35 The amount of a suit expense deducted for the specific performance of a sales contract was equal to the principle of a set of deductible costs, with the suit applicable costs paid off by the balance deductible amount. Was made under the plaintiff / injunction. The holder had deposited the balance amount after deducting the amount of the expenses owed to him against the plaintiff / decedent, after the judgment was issued with the plaintiff's costs, it would have been unconscionable in the law, if the plaintiff had incurred costs including The expense amount has to be deposited. Under the decree, if the claimant withdraws the money, including the expense amount from the court, the claimant will have to re-apply for a refund for the expense from the defendant if the claimant has already deducted the expense amount. Otherwise it would have been completely preserved. The principle of equal set-off
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Ahmadpur East lawyer