Find a Lawyer

RAZIA BEGUM versus ZAHOOR AHMAD

Section 2A [As entered by the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariah) Application Act (Amendment Ordinance (XIII of 1983)]] The original owner owned the land in two revenue states and after his death in 1947 The inheritance was changed in respect of one property - two widows, one son and four daughters were confirmed in favor of the deceased, while the inheritance change was confirmed in 1958 exclusively under customs of the deceased widow. It was done in favor of the only son of the late, as well as others who challenged the two variations in a lawsuit alleging deviations in a single property. By inheritance it was claimed that the second woman (his wife) and his two daughters were allowed to inherit the deceased's property by mistake because they have nothing to do with the recurrence of the deceased. The second-income property was challenged on the ground that the deceased's family was being run by personal law and not exclusively by customs alteration, the victim's son was an illegitimate plaintiff who made the allegation in the claim. The second widow and her two daughters were not entitled to inherit the deceased's property, he said, and the three women were required to have the necessary parties. Nevertheless, the three women said, the assistance was claimed by the plaintiffs in respect of the first property, the suit filed by the plaintiffs could not be approved to the extent the first property was changed. In the case of the Second State, the mutation passed away in the case of the deceased's son, nor was any prescription discussed by the Revenue Officer's son. advocates from Hangu lawyer