MUHAMMAD BOOTA versus THE STATE
The testimony of Section 302 witnesses, including the complainant, was not available on the spot as the FIR was lodged at the relevant time because after deliberation and consultation, nine persons were involved in the case, but the police Has never arrested eight accused. And arrested only the current suspect, who could not be guaranteed by the complainant about his actual interference. According to the fire expert, the medical evidence from the rifle recovered from the accused did not contradict his ocular testimony. Could not be identified to be proven by the defense version of the prosecution presented by the accused, it seems, that the prosecutor's version would be more respected than the defendant's circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Leepa lawyer
