Find a Lawyer

MST. MASOOMA BEGUM versus MST. RIAZ FATIMA

Section 8 Suit Occupation Occupations, Plaintiffs' Evidence Was Accused That Defendant Was A Violation and Unlawful Occupation Of The Suit Property And He Possessed That Plaintiff Approved The Claim To give them possession of the property and also remove the super structure. The trial court then dismissed the case after recording the evidence of the parties and hearing the parties' arguments, but the appellate court rejected the judgment passed by the trial court, before the parties on the same ground. A compromise was reached between the leaders of the locality in which the local commissioner dealt. In the case of suit property limitation it was stated that no encumbrances were made by the defendants regarding the suit property. Even in the report available on the record of the tehsildar no trace of alleged infringement by the claimant property claimed by the claimant was found. In the absence of any of the various cases in the trial court, which was present in the trial court, any valid evidence in support of the defendants' pleas, dismissed their case rightly, while the appellate court found that the appellate court was subject to illegal and material misconduct. The record decision contained false documents, was bound to be kept separately, and the trial was to be held by the court. High Court sets aside appellate court verdicts patent advocate from Moro lawyer