Find a Lawyer

MST. GHULAM BIBI versus SABIR HUSSAIN

Conducting challenging decree inquiries on allegations of section 12 (2), 151 and OF, R13 fraud and misrepresentation of the Code of Conduct 1908, for the decree passed by the debtor in charge of the specific performance of the contract The petitioner alleges that such decree was the result of a split between the general attorney and the plaintiff / order-taker, not necessarily an inquiry into all the applications filed under section 12 (2). And the brief request can also be briefly dismissed, but if the applicant clearly demonstrates the alleged fraud ? While challenging this decision in question, the court was required to conduct an inquiry in the present case, while hearing the decision of this case did not resolve the issues and decided the petition without recording the evidence of the parties, which resulted in justice. Was a question of failure. The decision can only be made after recording the evidence of the parties when the applicant claimed this declaration had never come to his knowledge in the EE question and that he had received notice of the notice as per section 12 (2). The petition was ordered to be dismissed, the CPC was set aside by the High Court and the case was remanded for decision. Request after compiling the issues arising from the parties' requests and recording the evidence attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Doltala lawyer