Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE KHAN versus SAEED AKHTAR KHAN

After converting sections 12 (2), 115, 104 and AXLIII, R1 the second appeal to the Appellate Court, it is concluded that the appeal was filed before the hearing, the appellate court granted its request. Rejected. If the appeal is considered as a revision, the jurisdiction will be very narrow, given the fact that the lower court's wrong decision cannot be related to the review application, after the approval of the appellate court as such The decision can be reversed. A direct violation of the default law that the right to exercise express judicial jurisdiction was not a privilege, but one of the most valuable rights the appellate court must first modify the appeal and then decide Before an impossible order is possible or not. The appellate court's ruling that the wrong decision of the court could not be subject to review was also a completely baseless order of the appellate partner. The following URL could not be retained. The appeal was considered by the trial court as civil revolt against the order passed under section 12 (2), CPC, rejecting its application for restitution and the case after hearing by the parties. The remand for the adjudication review decision was obtained. immigration advocates contact from Mamu kunjan lawyer