Find a Lawyer

MESSRS PEARL BUILDERS (PVT.) LTD. versus ARDESHER COWASJEE

O IV, Rr 6 and 15 dismiss counsel's absence in the absence of counsel Counsel for the application to restore the application argued that his absence at the hearing date of the review petition was not intentional but his It was requested because of his illness and his request. Medical Certificate with Medical Certificate was also made by fax with Medical Certificate but was not accepted The Advocate nor Advocate on record was present at the time of the review request hearing, although the request was sent by fax, but they It was not accepted by anyone because it was not signed, moreover it was reported on the forehead of every cause list that the request to postpone by fax would not accept the Advocate on record, Appears under the rules and makes the matter liable. His client and the lawyer's lawyer were responsible for the case before the court and in court, but he was absent without any notice to the participant. The URT, which was extremely malicious by him, therefore, cannot be excused without justification. The trend of Advocate Online records was caused by non-payment of duties required under the rules, which resulted in the loss of innocent clients. The appeal was dismissed by the Advocate for not presenting any reasonable grounds for the Supreme Court, which was absent even at the time of his presence. family advocate from Muridkay lawyer