Find a Lawyer

HAJI ABDUL HAQ (ABDUL HAYEE) versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Section 10 Land Development Act (XV of 1949), Section 23 Land Acquisition Act (Constitution of 1894), Section 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 24 and 185 (3) mandatory acquisition of alternative property rights for land. , The Applicants Protection / Thai Development Authority acquired this land and were to be given alternative land in the colony villages. The allotment of land to the applicants by the Commissioner was seized by the provincial government on the basis that the applicants claim that the applicants did not get the approval of the provincial government for the approval of the land because of the constitution. Under the jurisdiction, the Commissioner claimed to have disqualified the Agricultural Development Corporation through the High Court allotted by the High Court. Article 24 of the Constitution preserves and guarantees the valuable property rights of applicants. D and their losses were reduced or eliminated without any legal and reasonable compensation. The applicants further claimed that the Commissioner constituted a part of the provincial government, whose responsibility was to provide land to the applicants in exchange for the land acquired, even with the approval of the provincial government. Essentially, the ex post facto could not be obtained for which the applicants' rights could not be jeopardized. The controversial land was given to the Agricultural Development Corporation for development but was not used for the purpose for which the Agricultural Development Corporation. Was taken into custody. 7 2 1972 and its rights and responsibilities The Supreme Court has moved the petitioner to transfer the leave on appeal of the provincial government. family advocate from Wana lawyer