MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus THE STATE
Section 2302 (b) Appreciating Evidence The Complainant Was Not Really A Resident Of The Event Occurred In The Dark Of Night The complainant for the first time presented the torch for the first time in light of which he was accused Was identified, but the torch was neither mentioned in the FIR nor was it presented to the police during the investigation. Seven people were allegedly shot indiscriminately at the time of the incident. No crime was recovered from. The trial court's dishonesty was also revealed by the fact that during the course of the trial, the account was tried to bring the medical evidence into evidence, the prosecution failed to prove the motive of the incident. The crime was not empty. At the time of the incident, the recovery of the guns was of no consequence. At the relevant time, the presence of eyewitnesses on the suspected suspect was already raised the benefit of the doubt and exonerated the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Musakhel lawyer
