Find a Lawyer

ZUBEDA AKHTAR versus GHULAM RASOOL AZAD, EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (EDUCATION), SHEIKHUPURA

Section 4 contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), sections 4 and 5 constitution of Pakistan (1973), arts 199 and 201 constitutional petition for court temporarily grieving the transfer of a civil servant from District \ S to District \ F The tile appeal against his transfer before the Punjab Service Tribunal, which was directed by the Authority to direct the applicant to a nearby institution in the district \ S in, but said that on behalf of the applicant The tile constitution request was not accepted again. The High Court directed the authority to consider the petitioner's case within a stipulated period, but this directive was also not acted upon by the authority. The public service work was done by the Punjab Service Tribunal and the High Court. Was obliged to follow the instructions. Taking serious notice of the authority's conduct in avoiding the execution of the decisions of the Punjab Service Tribunal and the High Court, directing the Secretary Education and the Chief Secretary of the province to send a case with contempt of court request for what is happening in their departments. Examine the case where the relevant authority was not complying with the orders of the courts and is sitting in the office interpreting what is humiliating. The mandate of the Constitution, as envisaged by Article 201 of the Constitution, directs the higher authorities to issue instructions to the relevant authority to comply with the instructions of the courts or to aggravate the matter before the high forum. law websites from Balakot lawyer