MUHAMMAD NAZIR versus MUHAMMAD SHER
Appeal against the eviction of Section 417 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Rule 337A (ii), (iii) / 337 LB / 34 When the case was pending, the appellant himself filed the petition before the High Court and The Directive was found that the trial court was under the legal obligation to comply with the High Court order on the trial court, Judicial Magistrate Section 30, CRPC, provided many opportunities for the prosecution to present evidence, Prosecutors failed to produce evidence in court following the instruction. The High Court itself was obtained by the appellant, and the accused acquitted. In no case did the High Court appeal for interference, they were dismissed, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Shemier lawyer
