Find a Lawyer

CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE versus IRSHAD AHMAD

RR,, & and Respondents / Government Employees of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of Section X4 Section), Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3), Service Reinstatement Petition It was alleged that the civil servant (the main accused) lady teachers were appointed when such appointments were banned and that all such appointments were made without the approval of the recruitment committee and others. The accused / respondents facilitated that the wrong and vague appointments were made by the above person. The main suspect, who was a former Deputy District Education Officer, and the defendants / public servants did not say exactly that the slight increase in the education department had led to the main accused being fined for the reduction in salaries, The sentence was awarded, but the defendants were severely punished. The allegations against the respondents who were removed from the service were vague, sketchy, ambiguous and without any evidence numbers available to show how the respondents facilitated the bogus appointments and who were the beneficiaries. Respondents were reluctantly and seriously removed from employment which was a fine example of abuse and abuse of authority powers. The dismissal was granted by the Service Tribunal against the respondents through authority connection, which was strictly in accordance with the law, the rules of justice were set, and the appeal to the Court of Justice against the decision of the service tribunal on good grounds. Could not interfere with the leave of Merit less, especially when people when you need a advocate from Rangoo lawyer