Find a Lawyer

CH. SHAHBAZ BABAR versus REHMANA MIRZA

Sections 13 (3) (ii) (a) and 15 require personal property of the landlord for her husband because the premises required for the use and occupation of her husband were removed from her house. There are no exceptions to the filing request. Although the rent premises did not apply to the words husband in section 13 (3) (II) (a) of the West Pakistan Citizens Hire Ordinance, 1959, the requirement of the husband shall be included in the words which he uses and A feud may be valid. File a eviction application in relation to a non-residential building, if she has been able to prove that she needs the same thing in good faith for her husband's use, then both courts have, on the basis of the evidence Also, it turns out that the landlord needs a shop owner. Encouraged by her husband's personal need and that she wanted to start a business in the premises by her husband to earn a living for her family, and that the proprietor husband proved to be the only earning male member Works together with. The proceedings of both courts, based on the proper definition of evidence on record, cannot be interrupted by the High Court in the second appeal. immigration advocate from Kotla Jam lawyer