CUSTOM APPEAL NO. K-426 OF 2000, DECIDED ON 19TH AUGUST, 2002. versus CUSTOM APPEAL NO. K-426 OF 2000, DECIDED ON 19TH AUGUST, 2002.
Charges for unauthorized sale and counterfeit approval of a plastic molding compound and other imported goods from an active affiliate of the clearing agent to the clearing agent, section 32 (1) and (2) of the Customs Act 1969, because the clearing agent Had no control over the cargo when they were discharged from the harbor area and did not have to ensure their safe transport or supervise their arrival to the destination. No charges were filed against the clearing agent. Were to remain in the eyes of the law because there was no evidence that the clearing agent was involved in the case. Yes
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.