Find a Lawyer

APPEAL CASE NO.STA-344/PB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 29TH OCTOBER, 2002. versus APPEAL CASE NO.STA-344/PB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 29TH OCTOBER, 2002.

Sales Tax Act 1990 Section 36 Sales Tax Collection and Payment on Natural Gas Rules, Section RO 1014 (I) / 99, dated 149 1999 CBR Letter C No 2 (1) M (Audit) / 2002, History 8 7 2002 Taxes have not been charged nor a small tax has been imposed or small payment of gas waste tax has not been paid on the claim demanded by the Department of Taxation, its Later, the Central Board of Revenue reported that CNG was a factor in the loss of stations. For sales tax purposes, the maximum allowable up to 13 atC / Appellant agreed to pay the sales tax lost on 2% (15% minus 13%), ruin the department claims that the C.R.R. Letter C No 2 (1) M. (Audit) / 2002, 8 2002, 2002 was anticipated in nature and was also applicable for future sales tax audit and also in sales tax audit where reports were not finalized. In the past, the Validity Appellate Tribunal directed the appellant to pay the sales tax immediately at 2%. Losses are not a competition if paid by the due date, the additional tax levied will be exempt and if it fails to do so, receipt of a consolidated and non-disputed short payment of sales tax at the loss of 2%. Will be In the case of the remaining 13% with the additional tax, the appellate observed tribunal observed that the Central Board of Revenue \ 's guidelines called it the maximum legitimate waste and stated that the 13% was neither to be wasted. Not mandatory nor automatically deducting actual deductions (subject to maximum 13% depreciation) based on actual receipts and actual deliveries during the tax period and when you need a advocate from Kamalia lawyer