Find a Lawyer

KHALID MASIH versus THE STATE

Section 2302/5 365 / evidence 34 Testimony of Evidence No one was reported to the police ten days after the complaint was made through a written complaint. The evidence for the murder of the accused was last seen. Witness's brother and two other prosecution witnesses even offered a word about the last time the accused was in the company, even though the complaint stated that he had seen the dead person in the company's companionship with others. , But the witness was called the victim, the other two witnesses did not state when they saw the victim's suspect The statement of a witness in the company was allegedly recorded a month and a half later when the victim's body was recovered and the witness was not mentioned in the FIR as the accused's company, although the prosecution called him a star witness. Claimed to have been but said the witness was 50 miles away from the location of the scene, which usually opened at 9/10 am in the location and closed at 8/9 pm when the witness claimed that He saw the dead man at 5 pm in the company of the accused, who was not proud, where he allegedly saw the victim in the company of the accused. S against. Other witnesses were also identified as adulterants The deceased's body was not recovered on the suspect's identity, but was not identified at the time of the incident. But said that the tailor, who was presented as a prosecution witness, said he did not know whose body was in Cerro. law firms from Tank lawyer