WAZIR KHAN versus THE STATE
Section 2 evidence2 The testimony of the prosecution's star witness, who was also the FIR maker, had deviated to some extent in the trial, saying no evidence to show that the witness had not named the accused in the preliminary report. There was no direct or circumstantial evidence that the accused had made any conspiracy or there was no evidence of consultation with the other six persons to prove that the other six persons had shared information or shared intent with the accused. The fact that six people were involved in picking up the complainant was also a burden on the accused. It wasn't enough. The vehicle's owner was not recovered from the question, during which the Chief of Investigation gave the wrong impression that when the incident occurred the cleaner of the vehicle was not presented and no complaint was made. Was. It was told why he was not presented. Prosecutor has failed miserably to bring home the crime against Bean. Under any circumstances, the suspect was acquitted in the shadow of circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Domeli lawyer
