Find a Lawyer

RAFIQUE AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR

Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 8 and 12 of the Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 59 Fingerprint Expert Report of Proof of Evidence Report Two cases were filed by the parties, the plaintiff filed a case for possession. Ali filed a lawsuit for the specific performance of the contract. For the defendant's seller, it was in his favor to sell the suit land in favor of which the plaintiff's thumb impression on the document was denied and the fingerprint examined. The expert witness did, the report submitted to the trial court was not the author of this report, nor did he examine the document nor give his opinion on it, under which the trial court filed it by the defendant. The case was dismissed and the plaintiff was ordered to be acquitted, the appellate court reversed the trial. The court on the issue of document implementation on the assumption that since the plaintiff failed to prove a seizure on the defendant's defense, the ant and expert report established the impression of a thumb, therefore, filed by the plaintiff through the plaintiff. The appeal was allowed that the fingerprint expert's report did not prove to be lawful because it was signed by three officers. But the fingerprint bureau did not examine the impressions of the thumbs, so no witnesses were examined. The plaintiff's failure to substantiate the fingerprint expert's report was, therefore, a result of the appellate court-approved decision and ruling on material regression and misconduct. The jurisdiction verdict and the order passed by the appellate court were set aside and property advocate from Larkana lawyer