Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALID versus THE STATE

Under Section 561A Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 409/468/471 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the West Pakistan Anti-Corruption Establishment Ordinance (XX of 1961), Section 8 An application to terminate the proceedings was sought to terminate the grounds that, prior to this being the default offense, the local police had no jurisdiction to file a case and submit an invoice. Secondly, there was no trial against the accused. And third, that the proceedings could be terminated even after the registration of the cases in the normal police stations was not illegal, as Section 8 of the West Pakistan Anti-Corruption Establishment Ordinance, 1961 stated that the provisions of this ordinance existed. There were. Other than that, no other law will be disregarded, which would mean that all the provisions of the criminal code of conduct were maintained that the case against the civil servant could not be filed in the general police station and the senior Without the consent, the police officers and the accused were not acquitted of any of the charges, they had no power because the trial court had already charged that the accused had amended the charge at any stage under the law. Can be demanded and a decision was to be made on that basis. The evidence filed by the trial court High Court, of course, had the natural jurisdiction to terminate the proceedings even after the framing of the C. Harj, but in the present case there was substantial material on record against the accused, no jurisdiction was found pending in the pending proceedings before the trial court petition to halt the trial. registration advocate from Burewala lawyer