Section 15 (6) (1) Section 15, 6 (1) and 19 (2) Declaration of Sale of Mortgage Property Application under Section 15 (6) (1), Definition of Financial Institutions (Maintenance) Ordinance (1) 2001, the process of execution by the property occupant was held in mortgage in favor of the bank at the time of approval of the loan in favor of the judgment lenders in 1992. The property in question was pending, the process of unregistered rent. The mortgage for Modi was implemented after 10 from. No evidence was available on record from 1999 to 10 8 2004 5 The applicant paid advance rent for the applicant, and the decision-maker was a close relative, i.e. the applicant was the wife of one of the decision-makers and the other Sister had sister Approval of the application, in view of section 15 (6) of the Ordinance Executive Court, Proviso, in terms of section 15 (6), after approval of the application, after the explanation of the ordinance, has been passed. Are. The applicant was eaten and found out that he did not prove the rent process correct, then after applying his independent mind, he found out against the applicant that he was not a proud tenant. Was a law-enforcement court. In accordance with section 19 (2) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001, under its right to adopt any procedure at the time of execution of the decree and the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code 1908 were not attracted to the Strictus Senso. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
