Find a Lawyer

NISAR AHMAD SABRI versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Sections 4 and 17 (4) of the General Clauses Act (XX of 1897), Section 22 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Principles of Constitution Petition obtained under Section 17 (4) of the Auditorium Party and the Lux Penetty Assetability Land. Was gone The Acquisition Act, 1894, was handed over to the Government in the context of the Land Acquisition Guidelines issued in 1970 as it cost more than Rs 500,000 and after a thorough investigation by the Board of Revenue. Cost Approval Approved. The Board of Revenue withdrew its first order and the estimated cost of the land was increased from Rs 102 to Rs 93 per Rs 1,016 per maria, which was approved by the provincial government so that the authorities could collect the cost. To be managed. Subsequently, the applicant was notified, without notice of the appraisal of the interested landlords, that the Government now resort to reviewing this order, pursuant to section 22 of the General Clause Act, 894. Was unable to recall, because after the approval of the first order, a decisive action was taken and its power could not be exercised. In the present case, the applicants, according to the order sources, felt satisfied at the rate of Rs. 1,016 per marl and the award could also be approved on the basis of a subsequent review of the previous order and the cost reduction. There was a violation of this principle. The Audi ultimatum party (should not be heard by anyone) and it was a breach in the eyes of the law that the order passed by the Board of Revenue was without legal authority and with no legal effect, the High Court upheld the value of the land. Restore the first commitment of online advocate from South Wazirstan lawyer