Find a Lawyer

PATHANI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

The trial court ruled that a case was sought by the Appellate Court to remand the additional case by section 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 108 and AXLI, RR 23, 28, but the appellate court ruled And canceled the lawsuit. The court has to decide the additional case and determine whether the auction in the dispute relating to the proper land issue is in accordance with the matter, but also the decision of the appellate court hearing the matter accordingly. Can do. The case filed by the plaintiff was framed by the trial court, but in this regard the matter was also made a party and a decision was also made in the competing suit filed by the defendants against which the Appellate Court was dismissed. The matter could not be declared a party, which made the matter sufficiently sound. Although both suits in the appellate court through the trial court may dictate the additional case structure in terms of Sections 108 and AXLI, R 28, CPC, in the present case, it should result in a pre-trial trial. In the suit and the appellate court, the judgment and decree regarding the default issues in the cases can be legalized or even in the case of auction, the judgment and order hearing by the appellate court were rejected by the High Court. After hearing the parties, a decision to remand the case on merit was obtained patent advocate from Kakur Town lawyer