Find a Lawyer

GHEE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. versus MST. SURRAYA JAN

Civil Procedure Code of the CPC Decision Order XX and DRAXR18 Limitation Act (IX of 1908) Section 28 Hydrogenates) Vegetable Oil Industry, (Control and Development) Act (LXV of 1973), Section 27 The courts below the trial court for division as part of the suit joint venture found that the plaintiff was the joint owner of the suit property to the extent of 5/6 shares, and in favor of another person through a joint venture And there was another way of transferring ownership rights. The latter was declared by the company to be illegal and unauthorized because there was no valid sale transaction, therefore, the defendant's defense in the litigation proceeded as the co-owner of the property foundation, the contract 8 allegedly happened in 1960. The shareholder owns 1/6 of the suit property in favor of the said partner. Such document was unregistered and was never brought to the Revenue Record due to authority defaults. Was. Ndent failed to disclose any record in the entire tax record to the court which initiated the said agreement. The document is a defamatory / unpleasant and did not contain the signature of the claimant who was the co-owner of the property along with the claim. There is no record on the record as to whether the said partner is a shareholder with / / share, it may be stated that under the authority and authority of the said partner the claimant in the claimant's property (some of which are minor) May be coincidental or separate. In 1965, in favor of someone else and how the buyer had transferred the suit land in favor of the company. ask a advocate free from Gambet lawyer