Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus THE STATE

Section 302 Testimony of Evidence There was no prior hostility between the accused and the witnesses in the day-to-day incident and the actual culprit, with both eyewitnesses explaining their presence on the spot, with the witnesses dead. There is no basis for abandoning the relationship. Unless their testimony shows that they are unlawful and interested in the accused to falsely expel him, there was no previous rivalry between the parties as the exact number of the casualties. Was not mentioned, it will not show that his presence as a photographic image was not observed. It was not possible to be given through prosecution witnesses, the accused was convicted during the trial, the injuries attributed to the accused were fully confirmed by post-mortem, the report further added to the prosecution's handling of the crime. The recovery of the evidence was confirmed, the trial court had already taken a gentle approach. Uniformity or weakness of reasons, misinterpretation or misinterpretation of evidence in the absence of the accused, decision of the trial court reasoning. I cannot interfere with the appeal. tax advocates from Ghari Dupatta lawyer