Find a Lawyer

FAZAL MUHAMMAD versus GHULAM SHABBIR

After establishing the evidence for the trial and the testimony of each of the witnesses and the documents presented by the parties for the trial of sections 6 and 13, it was concluded that the plaintiff also had his own Students have performed Mohibit. Because according to the law, the student-in-law had substantiated the confirmation of the notice by two fact witnesses, even if the plaintiff did not make specific reference to the plaintiff's motive and the date, time and place of the case being formed. Are given Such ground may not be appropriate for the trial court, in which case, the appellate court did not justify the trial court's decision and the rejection of the ruling stating that the plaintiffs' history, with specific reference to the time, Did not describe And instead of declaring the appellate court's Toulouse decision, which the Supreme Court declared, was contrary to law, was not sustainable in the law and was set aside in the circumstances. immigration advocate from Fateh Pur lawyer