Find a Lawyer

AKBAR ALI versus ITBAR KHAN

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/148/149 testimony of the witnesses was not available on the spot and the witnesses at the relevant time claimed the witnesses who were with their deceased father and saw the accused on the victim. Many of the shooters falsely denied the circumstances and on the occasion raised suspicion in the same mind about the medical evidence and the site procedure also negated the account of the witnesses, which was presented by eyewitnesses. Could not be believed. Armed with sophisticated weapons such as Kalashnikov, the complaining party suffered shootings at a distance of about ten speeds, and the shooting continued for a while, but only one member of the complaining party was targeted and the remainder survived. Shown near the victim. No independent and unwanted witnesses from this castle were brought to the case to assist with Kokla to testify that the witnesses could not justify their presence on the spot, the prosecution did not say. It was said that when there was no direct purpose to attach the hand of the accused, he had taken the event of the life of the accused. The evidence of the perpetrators and the offenders in the commission of crimes was hardly of any nature on the basis that the accused could be convicted; there is no credible evidence to support the presence of a prosecution case; And the punishment of the accused was kept separate in the circumstances and he was acquitted. advocate for immigration from Dijkot lawyer