Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus CHIRAGH DIN

Section 12 and 27 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Failure to prove that the defendants knew of the previous agreement in the specific performance of the contract to sell the Buena Fighter buyers for notified price The plaintiff contended that the owner of the suit property had executed the contract to sell the contract in his favor and the owner acknowledged the execution of the contract, but the plaintiff did not recover any money from the owner. Denied, the plaintiff failed to pay the consideration amount, despite repeated demands, so the owner sold the property to the defendants. Here you go The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff and, under the jurisdiction to modify the judgment and order passed by the trial court, the appellate court upheld the High Court. It scanned the entire evidence and therefore dismissed the case. ? That the plaintiff did not claim in his claimant that the defendants knew of the contract, in the first place, were executed in favor of the plaintiff, nor did the testimony presented by the plaintiff prove the same justification. After examining the entire evidence, the High Court learned that defendant, who respected the sale agreement in favor of the plaintiff, was aware of a factual dispute. The decision identified a legal weakness that warranted a warrant under which the Supreme Court's appeal was denied. power of attorney advocate Nilore lawyer