Find a Lawyer

RAHAT NASEEM MALIK versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN

Rr 3 (c), 4 (1) (b) (ii) and 5 (1) (iv) Government Employees (Practices) Rules, 1964, R 12 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XVIII 1999 1999) Pre, Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) The mandatory retirement from the employee was imposed on a public servant as a result of his misdemeanor conviction for corruption. Understand its way out of its source of income; and the proportional assets announced in the annual declaration of studies were disproportionate to its leading source of income. The appeal filed by a public servant was rejected by the service tribunal based on the documentary evidence presented by the Inquiry Officer, which included declarations of assets and returns. The government employee's wealth tax, his apparent value, could not be denied by him as he was signing it, as the comparison of the two documents led to the indication that the public servant had sufficient financial resources. Because of this, he and his spouse are gaining real estate and immovable assets. The civil servant has no other legitimate source of income other than his salary, and against this limited source of income, In addition to supporting his family members, he was well-versed in the costs of education. On the joyous trips along with the children, the United States, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada received a former leave of Pakistan from the excuse of leaving government employees for medical checkups abroad, with no such checkups there. It was just, employees' behavior during the job family advocate from Upper Deval lawyer