Find a Lawyer

MACHIN KHAN versus SHER MUHAMMAD KHAN

Section Lim31 Limitation Act (IX 8 of 19088), Section 18 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVII, R6 Prior registration suit containing front-facing registered sale deadline, listed in the sale of boundaries 11 12 1999 Under which 28 6000 were excluded. Through the trial, the appellant's court claimed exemption under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1908, because it was read with oh VI, R 6, CPC that the defendant had forged As a result of its inaccurate history, it kept the sales process entry secret. The mutation cannot justify any fraud by the defendant in the purchase of the property and the mutation cannot be blamed for wrong mention of the date and place of the sale deed, which is in the Patwari constituency. Was a major mistake. No fraud was committed by the defendant; fraud cannot be pleaded for the first time in the trial, which was rightly denied the timely restriction of the suit in the amendment phase. d No interference was detected by the following courts for any illegal or material irregularities or any jurisdictional error or coordination of facts. The High Court dismisses the request for review. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Dadu lawyer