Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFOOR ALIAS CHAUDHARY versus THE STATE

Section 2302/4 Cri4 / Cri 34 Criminal Code (v. 898), Section 6969 Acc defendants appreciated the evidence. The crime was not proven, for example, because the police did not file a challan against the accused and it was named in the column number 2 report under section 119, hence the CRPC was quoted as saying the accused. The evidence against him was insufficient so the accused was not sent. The Standing Trial Judicial Magistrate was subsequently unable to pass an order under Cr 169, CR PC and could have sent the trial to the Sessions Court without a court order, only the trial court could have joined the accused and so on. The lawsuit could have been tried, but it did not. There was no evidence in connection with the conspiracy to link him with the Commission of Crime. The complainant and the prosecutor dismissed the charge. The accused was neither sent by the police nor the accused as a trial court order. The source was included against the accused and at the same time ordered to be released. immigration advocates email from Battagram lawyer