Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus THE STATE


Article 2302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the ocular evidence was truthful, credible and unrecognizable, and itself was sufficient to prove the accused without any evidence and to maintain the conviction of the accused. The evidence further supported the prosecution's case and the defense version was rejected. The presence of an eyewitness who suffered injuries at the hands of the accused and the witnesses of the other eye, on the spot, was no doubt confirmed by each other at each material point. Immediately after the filed FIR filed, the appeal for leave to appeal was denied.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Noor kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.