Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus THE STATE

Article 2302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the ocular evidence was truthful, credible and unrecognizable, and itself was sufficient to prove the accused without any evidence and to maintain the conviction of the accused. The evidence further supported the prosecution's case and the defense version was rejected. The presence of an eyewitness who suffered injuries at the hands of the accused and the witnesses of the other eye, on the spot, was no doubt confirmed by each other at each material point. Immediately after the filed FIR filed, the appeal for leave to appeal was denied. female advocates from Kamokey lawyer